Read my page on Homosexuality
This topic really belongs under related phenomena suggesting reincarnation but it is a controversial subject especially now that we have revoked don't ask don't tell and many States are in the process of or already have sanctioned gay couples as being legally married. We still have a long ways to go before all people accept gay couples as being morally married.
I go into this subject in more detail on my page dedicated to Homosexuality. I see homosexuality as a largely overlooked clue indicating that reincarnation is happening. Once reincarnation is proved, current arguments stating, "Homosexuality is a choice!", will no longer be sustainable. Hopefully one result will be many homosexuals, who have a hard time feeling good about themselves, will accept their life for what it is.
The debate in this case is, will proving reincarnation change the way society and homosexuals look at the issue? This debate is not about whether homosexuality is right or wrong and any posts to that affect will be deleted. I am especially interested in homosexuals who feel they have been reincarnated in the wrong gender and any one who feels they can recall a previous life that involves gender change needs to contact a researcher and tell them their story.
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Abortion
Read my page on Abortion
This beyond any doubt is one of the most controversial topics in this country. The subject is difficult to address because medical science has steadfastly refused to define what constitutes a human being. If there was any way to extend the doubt to preconception they would but common sense dictates that a human being is not possible until an egg has been fertilized. I haven't researched when that decision was finally made but it was a long time ago. Medical science has made huge strides since then but we remain stuck at conception being the moral compass for the creation of a human being. In contrast birth has become the legal determination for creation of a human being though most modernized nations have made abortion illegal in the third trimester. No matter, the two points of view couldn't be further apart if they tried. There is one exception. A person who murders a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. The reasoning being the women wanted to have her baby and would have, had she been allowed to live.
There is no humor in this subject. The pain and suffering caused by the inability to sit down and come to a reasonable solution on either side is practically unmeasurable. Not only are the lives of the unborn affected, relationships and families are torn apart by the opposing points of view. Religious beliefs are shaken to the core, shattered and even denied by the decisions of women who find themselves pregnant when they had made no plans to raise or bear a child.
The mental and physical health of both women and men are compromised and tragic decisions end in the murder of adults as well as children. All that and society still refuses to compromise.
All the above is why I have included the topic in this blog. You can read more about this subject on my page on abortion. The topic of this debate is will proving reincarnation is fact change the laws and this nation and the worlds moral outlook on abortion?
This will be a no holds barred discussion as I see both sides as being responsible for the current dilemma. My hope is proving reincarnation will get both sides to sit down and take a much harder look at each others points of view. Please try and stick to the topic.
This beyond any doubt is one of the most controversial topics in this country. The subject is difficult to address because medical science has steadfastly refused to define what constitutes a human being. If there was any way to extend the doubt to preconception they would but common sense dictates that a human being is not possible until an egg has been fertilized. I haven't researched when that decision was finally made but it was a long time ago. Medical science has made huge strides since then but we remain stuck at conception being the moral compass for the creation of a human being. In contrast birth has become the legal determination for creation of a human being though most modernized nations have made abortion illegal in the third trimester. No matter, the two points of view couldn't be further apart if they tried. There is one exception. A person who murders a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. The reasoning being the women wanted to have her baby and would have, had she been allowed to live.
There is no humor in this subject. The pain and suffering caused by the inability to sit down and come to a reasonable solution on either side is practically unmeasurable. Not only are the lives of the unborn affected, relationships and families are torn apart by the opposing points of view. Religious beliefs are shaken to the core, shattered and even denied by the decisions of women who find themselves pregnant when they had made no plans to raise or bear a child.
The mental and physical health of both women and men are compromised and tragic decisions end in the murder of adults as well as children. All that and society still refuses to compromise.
All the above is why I have included the topic in this blog. You can read more about this subject on my page on abortion. The topic of this debate is will proving reincarnation is fact change the laws and this nation and the worlds moral outlook on abortion?
This will be a no holds barred discussion as I see both sides as being responsible for the current dilemma. My hope is proving reincarnation will get both sides to sit down and take a much harder look at each others points of view. Please try and stick to the topic.
Environment
Read my page on the Environment
All that I need to say about reincarnations relationship to the environment can be found on my environment page. It is a topic that is discussed heavily but very little change results from all the discussion. My contention is reincarnation may add a new wrinkle and hopefully more people will take it more seriously then they do now. The topic for this debate is, will proving reincarnation is a fact make people take environmental issues more seriously? Tell me what you think.
All that I need to say about reincarnations relationship to the environment can be found on my environment page. It is a topic that is discussed heavily but very little change results from all the discussion. My contention is reincarnation may add a new wrinkle and hopefully more people will take it more seriously then they do now. The topic for this debate is, will proving reincarnation is a fact make people take environmental issues more seriously? Tell me what you think.
Evolution
Read my page on Evolution
I don't have a lot to add to my page on evolution. It is the reason for the season when it comes to reincarnation if it in fact is happening today. If it isn't happening now it will happen in the future because physical DNA is not set up to adapt to the rapid changes ability and knowledge are bringing to mankind. I believe reincarnation is happening now and has been happening since the dawn of mankind but that is what this debate is all about.
Please do not quote scripture or other solely religious argument against the concept. Theistic Evolution attempts to recognize scientific concepts but the focus here is on reincarnation being a result of species adaptation in human beings. If God exists, evolution is part of Gods plan which, by default, makes reincarnation part of God's plan. Do not attempt to make it part of any organized faiths plan. Any posts that attempt to discredit reincarnation solely on religious grounds will be deleted. If God exists all of natural science is Gods plan including reincarnation. Any attempt to portray it otherwise is a lot more far fetched than my hypothesis that reincarnation occurs.
The debate is, is reincarnation a result of species evolution in mankind? I do not want to limit this debate to scientists only but I encourage any scientist who feels they have something to add in laymen' s terms to please post to this debate.Of special interest to me is what are the capabilities of DNA and what may be its future capabilities as that information could deny the possibility of reincarnation or could lead to it no longer being required. I seriously doubt we are going to adapt into ethereal beings with no form but we cannot rule it out.
I don't have a lot to add to my page on evolution. It is the reason for the season when it comes to reincarnation if it in fact is happening today. If it isn't happening now it will happen in the future because physical DNA is not set up to adapt to the rapid changes ability and knowledge are bringing to mankind. I believe reincarnation is happening now and has been happening since the dawn of mankind but that is what this debate is all about.
Please do not quote scripture or other solely religious argument against the concept. Theistic Evolution attempts to recognize scientific concepts but the focus here is on reincarnation being a result of species adaptation in human beings. If God exists, evolution is part of Gods plan which, by default, makes reincarnation part of God's plan. Do not attempt to make it part of any organized faiths plan. Any posts that attempt to discredit reincarnation solely on religious grounds will be deleted. If God exists all of natural science is Gods plan including reincarnation. Any attempt to portray it otherwise is a lot more far fetched than my hypothesis that reincarnation occurs.
The debate is, is reincarnation a result of species evolution in mankind? I do not want to limit this debate to scientists only but I encourage any scientist who feels they have something to add in laymen' s terms to please post to this debate.Of special interest to me is what are the capabilities of DNA and what may be its future capabilities as that information could deny the possibility of reincarnation or could lead to it no longer being required. I seriously doubt we are going to adapt into ethereal beings with no form but we cannot rule it out.
Politics
Read my page on politics.
By politics I mean all current forms of governments that are considered legitimate that are currently practiced on this planet. They will all be affected once reincarnation is proven. To read my write up on this topic please click here.
I don't have a lot to add to my page other than to frame the direction I want this debate to go. As an example let's take a current problem we have here in America, illegal immigration. We take a group of people who through no fault of their own were not born in this country and criminalize them simply because they want to come to our country. There are two sides to this debate which neither seems to want to listen to. If one steps back and tries to remain objective, it becomes obvious we create this problem whether there is any reason to do so or not.
The topic here is what effect, if any, will proving reincarnation have on illegal immigration? I think the effect of reincarnation will be obvious but I want to know how it might affect the way you look at the topic.
Lets take one scenario where the effect will be one or two magnitudes higher, the country of Israel. Now we are talking some real have duty issues. An Al Qaida operative could easily die on a mission to Palestine and be reincarnated as a Jew if reincarnation is a fact. Maybe God/Allah won't let that happen but I don't believe that and should it happen, there will be no virgins for the hapless operative who instead will be raised by a Jewish mother. I am not trying to make light of what has serious implications for all involved but I do believe the above examples certainly sets the tone for this debate
Remember keep it simple and keep it on topic.
By politics I mean all current forms of governments that are considered legitimate that are currently practiced on this planet. They will all be affected once reincarnation is proven. To read my write up on this topic please click here.
I don't have a lot to add to my page other than to frame the direction I want this debate to go. As an example let's take a current problem we have here in America, illegal immigration. We take a group of people who through no fault of their own were not born in this country and criminalize them simply because they want to come to our country. There are two sides to this debate which neither seems to want to listen to. If one steps back and tries to remain objective, it becomes obvious we create this problem whether there is any reason to do so or not.
The topic here is what effect, if any, will proving reincarnation have on illegal immigration? I think the effect of reincarnation will be obvious but I want to know how it might affect the way you look at the topic.
Lets take one scenario where the effect will be one or two magnitudes higher, the country of Israel. Now we are talking some real have duty issues. An Al Qaida operative could easily die on a mission to Palestine and be reincarnated as a Jew if reincarnation is a fact. Maybe God/Allah won't let that happen but I don't believe that and should it happen, there will be no virgins for the hapless operative who instead will be raised by a Jewish mother. I am not trying to make light of what has serious implications for all involved but I do believe the above examples certainly sets the tone for this debate
Remember keep it simple and keep it on topic.
Religion
Read my Page on Religion
The practice of religion fulfills us, confuses us and can lead to obscene acts of atrocity or charitable works beyond imagination. There are so many mysteries to life mankind literally has no alternative to faith. Sadly faith can be used as tool by those who seek power over their fellow men and any man or woman who denies their gullibility makes them an easy mark for those who would take advantage of them.
In my page on religion I introduce what I think is a new approach to the subject and how reincarnation, once proven, will surely impact it.
Please try and stay on topic and refrain from quoting scripture, whatever the source, as I will delete all diatribes about the benefits of one faith over the other. As a matter of record I am a Deist who has practiced many religions before arriving at my current belief. Because of the influences of cultures and teachings in our youth, I advise all people to listen to their internal skeptic until truly inspired by whatever faith touches you. Try to understand why any faith appeals to you and be skeptical of any personal rewards or gain that could come from sources other than God.
The one thing we all need to consider whether you believe in a God, Gods or don't, is knowledge is what is and there is no requirement for it to serve any mans faith or lack of faith. It has and will change all faiths and non faiths as we discover new information. If you believe in God all the knowledge we possess and will learn comes from God. If you are a non believer in God, it is that which we have not discovered and let it, along with the things we already know, be the guide for your moral and philosophical development.
Once again, please try and stay on topic, which is reincarnation and the role it will play on religion. That includes evidence against reincarnation other than scripture. I will engage in dialog regarding the history of religion as it is pertinent to this discussion. An example is why were all the references and teachings regarding reincarnation dropped from the Christian faith?
Thank you and may God or whoever you desire bless you.
The practice of religion fulfills us, confuses us and can lead to obscene acts of atrocity or charitable works beyond imagination. There are so many mysteries to life mankind literally has no alternative to faith. Sadly faith can be used as tool by those who seek power over their fellow men and any man or woman who denies their gullibility makes them an easy mark for those who would take advantage of them.
In my page on religion I introduce what I think is a new approach to the subject and how reincarnation, once proven, will surely impact it.
Please try and stay on topic and refrain from quoting scripture, whatever the source, as I will delete all diatribes about the benefits of one faith over the other. As a matter of record I am a Deist who has practiced many religions before arriving at my current belief. Because of the influences of cultures and teachings in our youth, I advise all people to listen to their internal skeptic until truly inspired by whatever faith touches you. Try to understand why any faith appeals to you and be skeptical of any personal rewards or gain that could come from sources other than God.
The one thing we all need to consider whether you believe in a God, Gods or don't, is knowledge is what is and there is no requirement for it to serve any mans faith or lack of faith. It has and will change all faiths and non faiths as we discover new information. If you believe in God all the knowledge we possess and will learn comes from God. If you are a non believer in God, it is that which we have not discovered and let it, along with the things we already know, be the guide for your moral and philosophical development.
Once again, please try and stay on topic, which is reincarnation and the role it will play on religion. That includes evidence against reincarnation other than scripture. I will engage in dialog regarding the history of religion as it is pertinent to this discussion. An example is why were all the references and teachings regarding reincarnation dropped from the Christian faith?
Thank you and may God or whoever you desire bless you.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
The Right Tool
(If you are new to this blog please go to my first entry.)
It is my hypothesis the moment of reincarnation, in order to occur, will be observable if we can find the proper tool to observe it. We may have to look in a new area to see the phenomena but I believe the odds are we will be able to detect the event utilizing EEG technology. If we cannot the research would need to be expanded out side of of the frequency ranges we currently detect.
Since the developing human being is inside it's mothers womb, attempting to implement a monitoring device could place the unborn and it's mother at risk. In cases where there are medical reasons to do so, the risk could improve the chances of normal development but we would be dealing with a compromised fetal development possibly resulting in undecipherable data. We need to be able to monitor the unborn's EEG when there are no known complications.
There has been a lot of research done on the gestation of humans. If an entity is going to move into a developing brain it will happen somewhere between the 20th and 27th week of a normal pregnancy. That window will be narrowed considerably when research commences. The event we are looking for will happen very rapidly. All transference's of energy when one is dealing with phenomena in this frequency range happen rapidly. There is every reason to believe it will have an unique signature as it is an unique event. It is also my hypothesis there will be a related event where the developing brain signals it is ready for the process to occur. That event may have a longer base line.
I believe, I call it a beacon, is necessary because, in energy form, we have no sensory perception and have no awareness of the passage of time or the physical world. We all experience the phenomena when we go to sleep at night and most of us have been under a general anesthesia that disconnects our consciousness from our sensory perceptions. Communication and motion will happen at the quantum level. I will talk about this more later but right now it's time to introduce the tool.
The standard EEG device requires the placement of sensors on the human skull which are then connected to a recording and display device utilizing lead wires. Obviously any attempt to connect sensors with their accompanying wires to an unborn infant in the womb could seriously compromise the health of the unborn and the birth mother. There has been some research in this area. Unborn's who have been aborted in the 20th to 25th week of pregnancy have been studied utilizing EEG technology in at least one program. For obvious moral and legal reasons, research of this nature should never be condoned.
EEG is being used with neonatal patients in cases where the newborn infant has suffered trauma or birth deformity so the technology does exist giving us databases on the wave patterns associated with the recently formed human brain.
The event we are looking for could easily be masked or compromised by any sort of trauma or deformity. This study needs to be conducted on healthy unborn's with no known complications during the pregnancy with one possible exception. In cases where in utero surgical repair is required there could be a medical benefit in monitoring the brain waves of the developing fetus. Monitoring the brainwave patterns of the unborn would require a wireless EEG. They do exist though all I am aware of are still under development. Ideally the monitoring device needs to be external to the womb and would probably consist of an array of sensors encircling the birth mothers abdomen. There would be two basic types of sensors, ones designed to monitor the brainwaves of the developing fetus and ones passively tracking the position of the fetus in order to establish the correct geometry for the sensors detecting brainwaves. To my knowledge no such device is currently being researched though it would be of great benefit in cases where the pregnancy is being compromised by deformity or disease.
Wireless technology is required in either case. The sensor array encircling the abdomen would be subject to massive interference from lead placement, clothing and mobility. Since we do not know when the event will occur, monitoring will have to be continuous from week 20 though week 27 of the pregnancy.
The bulk of the research for the external array will involve the transference of energy through amniotic fluid and the monitoring of pressure changes on the birth mothers abdomen as the fetus moves in the womb. Most of the research has been done on the wireless requirements. There has been extensive research on transferring energy through liquid that will apply to this application. To my knowledge, none of that research has explored the environment under consideration. Since there are medical benefits associated with any research in this area no one should consider the research not worthy of funding or consideration. If we do discover a moment of life, and I believe we will, it will impact every facet of living one can envision. Humanity doesn't adjust well to living on a flat world that turns out to be round but look at the advances in science and knowledge and how past major milestones have changed our society.
In summation, our tool comes in two forms. The one closest to development would be used when in utero surgery is involved and there is a medical benefit to the patient. The data gathered will be compromised by the trauma or illness and evaluation will be more difficult. The event may be so significant there will be no question when it occurs. The debate then becomes what does the event tell us?
The tool we need the most will take longer to develop. There should be no problem finding volunteers for the program. Once again, there are many medical benefits for doing the research even if we find nothing to indicate the merging of an entity with a physical body.
The launching point for this new tool will be based on the ongoing research being conducted on wireless EEG devices, transmission of energy in liquids, development of a monitoring array and the research being conducted at the University of Virginia by Dr. Tucker and his department.
The most recent work on wireless EEG that I have found is being conducted at the University of San Diego in La Jolla California. The original wireless research was conducted at The University of Sussex in the 1980's. The latest report I have been available to find is listed in the Applied Physics Journal (AIP).
For reincarnation to be possible we have to exist in wave form when we are separated from a physical body. Research has been conducted and is ongoing, attempting to weigh our entity or soul. In 1907 Dr. Duncan "Om" MacDougall conducted experiments, no one has tried to repeat, that attempted to weigh a change in body weight as a person died. The conditions were not sufficiently controlled and his results have been debated many times. Currently Dr. Gerry Nahum wants to conduct experiments with no funding for an instrument he feels will detect the passing of a soul or entity from the body. I believe, acknowledging the existence of an energy component to the cycle of life as part of the evolutionary process in an advanced life form, adds credibility to any work being conducted in this field. We spend billions of dollars researching cosmetics and a plethora of other products that add nothing of real value in our lives. In 1907 Dr. MacDougall did detect something. That something may have been nothing more than the results of a faulty experiment but he may have actually detected something that science cannot discount as being impossible. Have we learned nothing since the days of Galileo?
I have done considerable research regarding the right tools especially since I started experiencing a visual phenomena comprised of diffused violet light patterns in my field of view. The patterns are normally circular in shape and and feature a constant light source, literally like someone is shining a violet laser into my eyes. I go into detail on the phenomena in my blog "Do you wanna see dead people?" I apologize for the deliberate attempt to lure readers in using references to an once popular movie but in the world of internet babble you do what you have to do. My research and experiences have led to a hypothesis. The entity that exists after physical death enters and exits our body via our retinas. Experimentation in 1942 deduced that the human eye is capable of resolving a single photon of light. They chose red light for their experiment. Had they chosen violet light instead we could be living in a far different world then we are today. We need to repeat the experiments using light from the other end of the spectrum. My studies also show we need to experiment with the CRY1 and CRY 2 proteins in the human eye as I hypothesis they are involved in the process. These studies can all be done with existing technology and I strongly suggest someone look into the phenomena associated with near ultraviolet and violet light in the human eye and brain stem.
This concludes the introduction to this blog. The posts to follow allow feedback to all the topics I have introduced. They will fulfill the second purpose of this blog which is to continue expanding the research as there are a lot of people out there who have a lot more knowledge than I do when it comes to specific topics. I hopefully have avoided any major pitfalls in my research so I expect no earth shattering posts but life is full of surprises and I say bring it on and let's see where it takes us.
To those of you that feel I should be tied to a stake and set on fire, please stick to science. I understand that western scripture, no matter whose, does not support my conclusions but that didn't stop Galileo. I am no Galileo but I do find myself in a similar position. Suffice to say the impact of what I propose will be enormous should my hypothesis be proved. Our current paradigm on how we all conduct our lives will be drastically altered, I believe, to the benefit of mankind. Very few oxes will remain ungored.
It is my hypothesis the moment of reincarnation, in order to occur, will be observable if we can find the proper tool to observe it. We may have to look in a new area to see the phenomena but I believe the odds are we will be able to detect the event utilizing EEG technology. If we cannot the research would need to be expanded out side of of the frequency ranges we currently detect.
Since the developing human being is inside it's mothers womb, attempting to implement a monitoring device could place the unborn and it's mother at risk. In cases where there are medical reasons to do so, the risk could improve the chances of normal development but we would be dealing with a compromised fetal development possibly resulting in undecipherable data. We need to be able to monitor the unborn's EEG when there are no known complications.
There has been a lot of research done on the gestation of humans. If an entity is going to move into a developing brain it will happen somewhere between the 20th and 27th week of a normal pregnancy. That window will be narrowed considerably when research commences. The event we are looking for will happen very rapidly. All transference's of energy when one is dealing with phenomena in this frequency range happen rapidly. There is every reason to believe it will have an unique signature as it is an unique event. It is also my hypothesis there will be a related event where the developing brain signals it is ready for the process to occur. That event may have a longer base line.
I believe, I call it a beacon, is necessary because, in energy form, we have no sensory perception and have no awareness of the passage of time or the physical world. We all experience the phenomena when we go to sleep at night and most of us have been under a general anesthesia that disconnects our consciousness from our sensory perceptions. Communication and motion will happen at the quantum level. I will talk about this more later but right now it's time to introduce the tool.
The standard EEG device requires the placement of sensors on the human skull which are then connected to a recording and display device utilizing lead wires. Obviously any attempt to connect sensors with their accompanying wires to an unborn infant in the womb could seriously compromise the health of the unborn and the birth mother. There has been some research in this area. Unborn's who have been aborted in the 20th to 25th week of pregnancy have been studied utilizing EEG technology in at least one program. For obvious moral and legal reasons, research of this nature should never be condoned.
EEG is being used with neonatal patients in cases where the newborn infant has suffered trauma or birth deformity so the technology does exist giving us databases on the wave patterns associated with the recently formed human brain.
The event we are looking for could easily be masked or compromised by any sort of trauma or deformity. This study needs to be conducted on healthy unborn's with no known complications during the pregnancy with one possible exception. In cases where in utero surgical repair is required there could be a medical benefit in monitoring the brain waves of the developing fetus. Monitoring the brainwave patterns of the unborn would require a wireless EEG. They do exist though all I am aware of are still under development. Ideally the monitoring device needs to be external to the womb and would probably consist of an array of sensors encircling the birth mothers abdomen. There would be two basic types of sensors, ones designed to monitor the brainwaves of the developing fetus and ones passively tracking the position of the fetus in order to establish the correct geometry for the sensors detecting brainwaves. To my knowledge no such device is currently being researched though it would be of great benefit in cases where the pregnancy is being compromised by deformity or disease.
Wireless technology is required in either case. The sensor array encircling the abdomen would be subject to massive interference from lead placement, clothing and mobility. Since we do not know when the event will occur, monitoring will have to be continuous from week 20 though week 27 of the pregnancy.
The bulk of the research for the external array will involve the transference of energy through amniotic fluid and the monitoring of pressure changes on the birth mothers abdomen as the fetus moves in the womb. Most of the research has been done on the wireless requirements. There has been extensive research on transferring energy through liquid that will apply to this application. To my knowledge, none of that research has explored the environment under consideration. Since there are medical benefits associated with any research in this area no one should consider the research not worthy of funding or consideration. If we do discover a moment of life, and I believe we will, it will impact every facet of living one can envision. Humanity doesn't adjust well to living on a flat world that turns out to be round but look at the advances in science and knowledge and how past major milestones have changed our society.
In summation, our tool comes in two forms. The one closest to development would be used when in utero surgery is involved and there is a medical benefit to the patient. The data gathered will be compromised by the trauma or illness and evaluation will be more difficult. The event may be so significant there will be no question when it occurs. The debate then becomes what does the event tell us?
The tool we need the most will take longer to develop. There should be no problem finding volunteers for the program. Once again, there are many medical benefits for doing the research even if we find nothing to indicate the merging of an entity with a physical body.
The launching point for this new tool will be based on the ongoing research being conducted on wireless EEG devices, transmission of energy in liquids, development of a monitoring array and the research being conducted at the University of Virginia by Dr. Tucker and his department.
The most recent work on wireless EEG that I have found is being conducted at the University of San Diego in La Jolla California. The original wireless research was conducted at The University of Sussex in the 1980's. The latest report I have been available to find is listed in the Applied Physics Journal (AIP).
For reincarnation to be possible we have to exist in wave form when we are separated from a physical body. Research has been conducted and is ongoing, attempting to weigh our entity or soul. In 1907 Dr. Duncan "Om" MacDougall conducted experiments, no one has tried to repeat, that attempted to weigh a change in body weight as a person died. The conditions were not sufficiently controlled and his results have been debated many times. Currently Dr. Gerry Nahum wants to conduct experiments with no funding for an instrument he feels will detect the passing of a soul or entity from the body. I believe, acknowledging the existence of an energy component to the cycle of life as part of the evolutionary process in an advanced life form, adds credibility to any work being conducted in this field. We spend billions of dollars researching cosmetics and a plethora of other products that add nothing of real value in our lives. In 1907 Dr. MacDougall did detect something. That something may have been nothing more than the results of a faulty experiment but he may have actually detected something that science cannot discount as being impossible. Have we learned nothing since the days of Galileo?
I have done considerable research regarding the right tools especially since I started experiencing a visual phenomena comprised of diffused violet light patterns in my field of view. The patterns are normally circular in shape and and feature a constant light source, literally like someone is shining a violet laser into my eyes. I go into detail on the phenomena in my blog "Do you wanna see dead people?" I apologize for the deliberate attempt to lure readers in using references to an once popular movie but in the world of internet babble you do what you have to do. My research and experiences have led to a hypothesis. The entity that exists after physical death enters and exits our body via our retinas. Experimentation in 1942 deduced that the human eye is capable of resolving a single photon of light. They chose red light for their experiment. Had they chosen violet light instead we could be living in a far different world then we are today. We need to repeat the experiments using light from the other end of the spectrum. My studies also show we need to experiment with the CRY1 and CRY 2 proteins in the human eye as I hypothesis they are involved in the process. These studies can all be done with existing technology and I strongly suggest someone look into the phenomena associated with near ultraviolet and violet light in the human eye and brain stem.
This concludes the introduction to this blog. The posts to follow allow feedback to all the topics I have introduced. They will fulfill the second purpose of this blog which is to continue expanding the research as there are a lot of people out there who have a lot more knowledge than I do when it comes to specific topics. I hopefully have avoided any major pitfalls in my research so I expect no earth shattering posts but life is full of surprises and I say bring it on and let's see where it takes us.
To those of you that feel I should be tied to a stake and set on fire, please stick to science. I understand that western scripture, no matter whose, does not support my conclusions but that didn't stop Galileo. I am no Galileo but I do find myself in a similar position. Suffice to say the impact of what I propose will be enormous should my hypothesis be proved. Our current paradigm on how we all conduct our lives will be drastically altered, I believe, to the benefit of mankind. Very few oxes will remain ungored.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)